Jodi with defense attorney Jennifer Wilmott during a hearing on September 15, 2014.

Jodi with defense attorney Jennifer Wilmott during a hearing on September 15, 2014.

This website has information about the trial of Jodi Arias, made by independent supporters who maintain she was wrongly convicted. The Blog will be to provide updates, or to link to related articles of interest.

The prosecution made a circumstantial case for premeditated murder, however when examined carefully, some evidence was ambiguous, some was flawed and taken as a whole the prosecution case makes no sense at all. We hope to explain that clearly in this website.

Next: Case Summary.

“Circumstantial evidence is a very tricky thing, it may seem to point very straight to one thing, but if you shift your own point of view a little, you may find it pointing in an equally uncompromising manner to something entirely different.” — Sherlock Holmes

3 thoughts on “Home

  1. Edgar R Longenecker

    The prosecutorial repudiation of the three stooges, exculpatory evidence, concealment, for five years, then, sleazed into, an aboutfaced, reversal of format, ended the noncase, against, Jodi Arias; and, tacitly admitted to the prosecutorial conspiracy to obstruct justice, , without a bleat from the sheeple on the jury, or, the two governors, who refused to rescind the interstate authoritative, kidnapping at law, despite the recanted, three stooges, confessions…that, they needed to unperjure their previously sworn testimony, to, then, declare the opposite to be the truth; as if any of these criminals at law, have anything but, contradictory, truths; whatwith, having been badgered by the prostitutor, into lockstep perjuries, to claim that each of the three stooges, had an epiphany, at the same time, to arrive miraculosly, at the same time, then, arrived at the opposite conclusion, later, at the same time, in reverse; then, continued their lies at law, as if any of them had credibility, while expounding back to back lies, for five years, of embezzling Jodis freedom, from these lizards at law, trying to grow evidence, by lying, back and forth, while confessing to the lies they already told….. There was, no case to be tried, upon recant, of their lies, so, it matters not that if Jodi wanted to play Joan of Ark, or, the Easter Bunny, or tell you she was Santa Claus, whatwith, the fraudulent conmtinuation of a recanted, and, perjury based, soap opera…. reversed; proving, reasonable doubt, already, so perjured…. what could those “lies,” on her part, did it matter, considering the fiction of the recanted, soap opera…??? … Snidely… Edgrrr…



Leave a comment ( only civil, on-topic comments will be approved )

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s